Consider the example of contradictory fundamental beliefs, in the paragraph that begins "The third benefit which the study of philosophy can confer . . ." Explain why belief in free will conflicts with belief in causal laws of nature. Can you resolve the apparent conflict? If so, explain how. If not, explain why not.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is The belief in free will conflicts with the belief in causal laws of nature because free will suggests that individuals have the ability to make choices and decisions independent of any external influences, while causal laws of nature suggest that every event is determined by preceding events in a predictable and deterministic manner. This apparent conflict arises from the tension between the idea of personal agency and the idea of a deterministic universe governed by causal laws.

One possible resolution to this conflict is to consider the concept of compatibilism, which argues that free will and determinism are not mutually exclusive. According to compatibilism, individuals can still have free will even in a world governed by causal laws, as long as their actions are the result of their own desires, intentions, and rational deliberation. In other words, free will is compatible with causal determinism if it is understood as the ability to act in accordance with one's own internal motivations, even if those motivations are themselves determined by prior causes.

Another potential resolution is to reconsider our understanding of causal laws of nature. While it may seem that these laws dictate a strict determinism, some philosophers argue that the nature of causality is not as rigid as it may appear. For example, quantum mechanics introduces a level of indeterminacy at the subatomic level, suggesting that the universe may not be as deterministic as classical physics would suggest. This opens up the possibility for a more nuanced understanding of causal laws that allows for the existence of free will.

Ultimately, whether or not the apparent conflict between free will and causal laws of nature can be fully resolved is a matter of ongoing philosophical debate. While compatibilism and reinterpreting causal laws offer potential ways to reconcile these contradictory beliefs, the question of free will and determinism remains a complex and unresolved issue in philosophy.

Consider the Example of Contradictory Fundamental Beliefs, in the Paragraph