With which of the following statements would Zagzebski be most likely to agree?
A) Pascal's wager provides a good reason for everyone to believe in the Christian God, since all of the objections can be answered.
B) Pascal's wager does not provide anyone with a good reason to believe in the Christian God, though it does provide reason to be religious.
C) Pascal's wager provides a good reason for some people in some circumstances to cultivate a belief in the Christian God.
D) Pascal's wager does not provide anyone with a good reason to accept religious faith of any kind, whether Christian or otherwise.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Zagzebski's view is that Pascal's wager can provide a good reason for some people in some circumstances to cultivate a belief in the Christian God. She argues that for people who are genuinely unsure about the existence of God, Pascal's wager can provide a reason to explore the possibility of God's existence and to live as if God exists, even if they are not yet convinced through evidence or argument. However, Zagzebski also acknowledges that Pascal's wager is not a conclusive argument for the existence of God and may not be persuasive for everyone.

With Which of the Following Statements Would Zagzebski Be Most