Which of the following theories is inconsistent with the claim that there can be valid moral arguments?
A) Ethical objectivism
B) Ethical subjectivism
C) Ethical relativism
D) Expressivism

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Expressivism denies that moral language can be used to make truth claims and instead sees it as a tool for expressing emotions or attitudes towards actions. This means that there cannot be valid moral arguments according to expressivism. The other three theories (ethical objectivism, ethical subjectivism, and ethical relativism) all allow for the possibility of valid moral arguments.

Which of the Following Theories Is Inconsistent with the Claim