According to the central argument of Zakowski et al.'s (2001) goodness-of-fit hypothesis, it is preferable to use problem-focused coping (as opposed to emotional-focused coping) when the stressor is:

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The goodness-of-fit hypothesis argues that problem-focused coping is most effective when stressors are controllable, meaning that individuals have some level of control over the source of stress. This allows for active efforts to be made towards solving the problem, which can lead to decreased stress levels. Uncontrollable stressors, by contrast, are those that are beyond an individual's control, and may require emotional-focused coping strategies to manage the negative emotions associated with the stressor. Mild or moderate stressors may not require the use of problem-focused coping, as they may not present a significant threat or challenge that requires active problem-solving strategies. Pervasive stressors, which are those that affect multiple areas of life, may require a combination of problem-focused and emotion-focused coping strategies.

According to the Central Argument of Zakowski Et Al