The case of Dick Bentley Productions Ltd v Harold Smith (Motors) Ltd (1965) is authority for the fact that:
A) If the substance of a statement suggests that further verification is required, it is unlikely to be a term
B) Where a statement is made by an expert in a particular area to a non-expert it is likely to be a term
C) Where the parties have committed their statements to writing, they will be recognised as terms
D) Where the statement has not been included in a written contract, it will never be a term
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q37: Anna agreed to sell beans to Nanki
Q38: What is meant by the contra proferentem
Q39: Which of the following is not a
Q40: Angela bought an ipod from Addica Electronics
Q41: What is not required to include an
Q42: What is a 'collateral contract'?
A) A secondary
Q43: Which of the following is not a
Q44: Who is an 'officious bystander'?
A) A police
Q46: Terms can be implied into a contract
Q47: Where can the statutory provision be found
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents