Which of the following two are features of a legitimate acceptance of a repudiatory breach as set out by Lord Steyn in Vitol v Norelf?
A) The acceptance of a repudiatory breach must be effectively communicated like any other contractual acceptance
B) An act of acceptance of a repudiation requires no particular form
C) The aggrieved party must notify the other party to the contract before they may engage in a similar contract elsewhere to allow the party in breach to correct their performance
D) The aggrieved party need not personally, or by an agent, notify the repudiating party of his election to treat the contract as at an end
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: The general rule is that a contract
Q2: If the victim of a repudiatroy breach
Q3: Which of the following cases involve an
Q4: In which cases have the courts overtly
Q6: Given the more flexible attitude that has
Q7: Should the commission of a repudiatory breach
Q8: Distinguish between rescission and repudiation.
Q9: To what extent will the categorisation given
Q10: Intermediate terms could be regarded as bringing
Q11: Why does a long term contract pose
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents