In Arcos Ltd v EA Ronaasen & Son a contract was held not discharged because the timber supplied was 1/8 of an inch thicker than agreed, despite being usable for its intended purpose.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q12: What is the effect of an anticipatory
Q13: Why did the House of Lords disagree
Q14: When one party indicates to another that
Q15: The term at issue in the
Q16: In Re Moore & Co and Landauer
Q18: Generally, a party who has failed to
Q19: A severable contract is useful because it
Q20: A repudiatory breach of a contract will
Q21: Terms implied by the Sale of Goods
Q22: In Schuler v Wickman the House
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents