For what reason does Lord Loreburn (in Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC) reject the implied term as a basis for discharging frustrated contracts?
A) Because the law prohibits the implication of terms of this nature
B) Because it is illogical to imply a term in relation to events that are patently outside the contemplation of the parties
C) Because such a term would be contrary to public policy and would be destructive to parties' contract
D) Because there are statutory provisions which provide for all frustrated contracts and such an approach is contrary to that statute
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: The Super Servant II demonstrates that
Q18: Like any other contract, a contract for
Q19: The effect of frustration is to render
Q20: The common law remedy for frustration has
Q21: Parties can choose to displace the provisions
Q23: In Krell v Henry what event
Q24: What criticisms are made of the Law
Q25: George, a UK citizen, contracts with the
Q26: Which of the following needs to be
Q27: Is a contract frustrated when:
A) All purposes
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents