If the Argument from Marginal Cases is sound, then

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Argument from Marginal Cases suggests that if we grant certain moral considerations to humans who are at the margins of society (e.g., those with severe cognitive impairments), based not on their abilities but on their membership in the human species, then we should also extend similar moral considerations to animals that have comparable or superior abilities. This does not necessarily mean all animals are as morally important as all humans (A), nor does it imply a hierarchy of moral importance among animals and humans (B or C). Instead, it argues for the moral consideration of some animals on par with some humans, based on comparable capacities or characteristics.

If the Argument from Marginal Cases Is Sound, Then