Why, according to Carruthers, does our attachment to pets not give rise to a social-stability argument justifying an extension of moral standing to animals?
A) Pet-keeping and attachment to pets is not a universal feature of human nature.
B) Our attachment to pets is rarely as deep as attachments to relatives and children.
C) Granting moral standing to animals will open the floodgates to extending moral status to anything we care about.
D) Both a and b
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q88: Which of the following does Carruthers claim
Q89: Which of the following does Carruthers claim
Q90: According to Carruthers, the capacity to govern
Q91: Which of the following is sufficient for
Q92: Why, according to Carruthers, would rational contractors
Q94: Torturing an animal or causing it unnecessary
Q95: What do our duties toward animals derive
Q96: According to Carruthers, the common-sense intuition that
Q97: What is contractualism? Is this the best
Q98: Carruthers claims that the social-stability argument cannot
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents