According to Hill, harm to humans and rights violations are

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Hill argues that harm to humans and rights violations are good reasons to oppose environmental destruction, but they are not the only reasons. He argues that environmental destruction is morally wrong in and of itself, and that nature has inherent value that should be respected. Therefore, while harm to humans and rights violations are important considerations, they do not outweigh the fundamental moral obligation to protect the environment.

According to Hill, Harm to Humans and Rights Violations Are