According to Sinnott-Armstrong, it can be morally better not to drive unnecessarily without
A) humans bearing significant responsibility for global warming.
B) it being wrong to drive unnecessarily.
C) it being morally permissible to drive unnecessarily.
D) governments being obligated to fight global warming.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Sinnott-Armstrong argues that it can be morally better not to drive unnecessarily because of the environmental impact, even if it's not considered outright wrong to do so. This perspective emphasizes the importance of individual actions in contributing to broader environmental goals without necessarily invoking legal or moral obligations.

According to Sinnott-Armstrong, It Can Be Morally Better Not to Drive