Rachels concludes that euthanasia is
A) sometimes morally acceptable because it promotes the best interests of all involved and violates no one's rights.
B) never morally acceptable because it kills an innocent human being.
C) sometimes morally acceptable because it maximizes happiness.
D) never morally acceptable because it would be abused if it were allowed.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Rachels argues that euthanasia can be morally acceptable if it promotes the best interests of all involved and violates no one's rights. He rejects the argument that euthanasia is always wrong because it involves killing an innocent human being, citing cases where passive euthanasia (i.e. withholding or withdrawing treatment) is allowed even though it results in death. He also argues that concerns about abuse can be addressed through proper regulation and safeguards. Therefore, the best choice is A.

Rachels Concludes That Euthanasia Is