Why, according to Harris, can doctors not defend inaction by arguing that neither law nor convention requires them to kill in order to save lives?
A) Because doing so begs the question
B) Because such an argument is an appeal to custom or authority
C) Because such an argument is an expression of moral squeamishness
D) All of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer of Why, according to Harris, can doctors not defend inaction by arguing that neither law nor convention requires them to kill in order to save lives?
A) Because doing so begs the question
B) Because such an argument is an appeal to custom or authority
C) Because such an argument is an expression of moral squeamishness
D) All of the above

Why, According to Harris, Can Doctors Not Defend Inaction by Arguing