Which of the following is a reason to doubt that restricting immigration is required to offer protection from dangerous attacks?
A) Countries have a right to deny entry to those it reasonably suspects of being dangerous.
B) Restricting immigration laws does not make a country less secure.
C) Very few foreign terrorists would be deterred by anti-immigration laws.
D) All of the above

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Option C states that very few foreign terrorists would be deterred by anti-immigration laws, which implies that such laws may not be effective in preventing dangerous attacks. Therefore, it is a reason to doubt the necessity of restricting immigration for protection from attacks. Options A and B provide reasons in support of restricting immigration, which goes against the premise of the question. Option D includes all options, but not all of them are relevant or correct reasons to doubt the necessity of immigration restrictions for protection.

Which of the Following Is a Reason to Doubt That