According to Hidalgo, stopping someone who is already relatively well-off from immigrating is
A) morally permissible.
B) less bad, morally, than stopping someone who is desperate and destitute.
C) neither better nor worse, morally, than stopping someone who is desperate and destitute.
D) morally obligatory.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Hidalgo argues that preventing someone who is desperate and destitute from immigrating is morally worse than preventing someone who is already relatively well-off. Therefore, it can be inferred that stopping someone who is already relatively well-off from immigrating is less bad, morally, than stopping someone who is desperate and destitute.

According to Hidalgo, Stopping Someone Who Is Already Relatively Well-Off