How Does the Sociospatial Perspective Explain Why HOPE VI Resulted

How does the sociospatial perspective explain why HOPE VI resulted in mixed outcomes, with spatially concentrated effects in which adjacent neighborhoods were not impacted by redevelopment of neighboring areas?

A) The SSP sees urban social problems as national and regional in scope, so it would not expect improvements in a targeted neighborhood to have a significant effect on the city as a whole
B) The SSP sees urban social problems as being entirely cultural in nature, so because Hope VI focused on economic development, it would not expect the program to have robust cultural impacts
C) The SSP is supportive of programs rooted in local government, and so would assume that any federally-created program could misunderstand the communities in which it is being enacted and would have mixed results
D) Actually, the SSP sees the outcomes of HOPE VI as wholly positive, with targeted redevelopment benefiting all urban residents.