An outcome of the review process being imperfect is that it requires…
A) editors who have a broad and deep perspective on the field.
B) reviewers who are willing to review papers for a cheap price.
C) editors who have a lot of controversial ideas.
D) reviewers who have relatively little experience to be more objective.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Because the review process is imperfect, editors who have a broad and deep perspective on the field are necessary to ensure a fair and thorough review process. They can provide guidance and oversight to the reviewers to ensure that the papers are evaluated objectively and rigorously. The other choices are not relevant or appropriate for addressing the imperfections of the review process.

An Outcome of the Review Process Being Imperfect Is That