Phrenology was a "productive false start" in each of the following ways EXCEPT

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Phrenology has been discredited as a legitimate science, and the method of cranioscopy, which involved examining the shape and size of a person's skull to determine their personality traits, has been widely criticized as pseudoscientific and inaccurate. Therefore, endorsing this method is not a productive false start. However, phrenology did draw attention to the brain as the central organ of intellect, demonstrate that human nature could be scientifically studied, and spur research into localization of function in the brain, making these options productive false starts.

Phrenology Was a "Productive False Start" in Each of the Following