In terms of how science changes, one could argue that Historian Thomas Kuhn's analysis uses a ___________ approach that emphasis the human dimension of science. In contrast, Sir Karl Popper offered an interesting theory of scientific change because Popper tackles the question of how science changes from a ________ rather than a historical point of view.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Kuhn's analysis is considered naturalistic because it focuses on the actual practices and historical developments in science, emphasizing the human dimension and how scientific paradigms shift. Popper's approach is normative, focusing on the logical structure of scientific discovery and the methodology of falsification as a criterion for scientific progress, rather than historical or empirical studies.

In Terms of How Science Changes, One Could Argue That