When the court ruled against Abigail Roberson in her appropriation suit against the Rochester Folding Box Company, the decision was based on which of the following?
A) Roberson had given her consent
B) Roberson was a minor and therefore had no privacy rights
C) the photograph in question was taken at a public event
D) the photograph was not used for commercial purposes
E) the state in which Roberson lived (New York) had no laws dealing with appropriation
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q4: "Truth" is a strong defense against both
Q5: The concept of privacy is mentioned in
Q6: The Cox Doctrine is a three-part test
Q7: A controversial method of newsgathering is for
Q8: An exception to appropriation law that allows
Q10: In the "private facts" cases of Sidis
Q11: Which of the following is NOT considered
Q12: Which of the following is an example
Q13: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Jerry
Q14: In the cases of Cantrell v. Forest
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents