Common law provides four appropriation defenses journalists may use when defending themselves against private facts lawsuits. Which of the following is NOT one of those four?
A) proving that the story in question was newsworthy
B) proving that the information was already in the public domain
C) proving that the information was more than 10 years old and therefore the statute of limitations had expired
D) proving that the information came from a consensual interview or was otherwise revealed voluntarily
E) proving that the information, while on the list of examples of private information, is not highly embarrassing or offensive
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: An exception to appropriation law that allows
Q9: When the court ruled against Abigail Roberson
Q10: In the "private facts" cases of Sidis
Q11: Which of the following is NOT considered
Q12: Which of the following is an example
Q13: The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Jerry
Q14: In the cases of Cantrell v. Forest
Q15: In the appropriation case of Midler v.
Q16: In the privacy/false light suit of Time
Q18: In the private facts cases of Cox
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents