In which of the following cases did the defendant in a case of alleged rape claimed that the provisions of the YJCEA 1999 were contrary to Art 6 of the ECHR to the extent that they prevented him from putting forward a full and complete defence?
A) Brown v Stott (2001)
B) O'Halloran v UK (2007)
C) Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions (2004)
D) R v A (2001)
E) R v Rezvi (2002)
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q13: The Rule of Law, in its most
Q14: In analysing Dicey's version of the rule
Q15: Tension exists between the rule of law
Q16: The idea of the _ is posited
Q17: _ prevents the executive from trying to
Q19: Which concept allows for countries to deal
Q20: The rule of law does not favour
Q21: Some statutory offences place a reverse burden
Q22: It is the job of the judiciary
Q23: The three organs of the state remain
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents