Daubert v. Merrill Dow used statistical significance as a point to contend a certain drug caused birth defects.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Daubert v. Merrill Dow case did use statistical significance as a point to contend that a certain drug caused birth defects. The case involved the drug Bendectin and the plaintiffs argued that there was a statistically significant association between the drug and birth defects. The court ruled that the plaintiffs' evidence did not meet the Daubert standard for scientific validity, but the case is still often cited in discussions of statistical significance and causation.

Daubert V Merrill Dow Used Statistical Significance as a Point to to Contend