If you were asked to recommend whether a poor country with a multiparty system should adopt presidentialism or parliamentarism, which would you choose? Assume that your goal is to allow them to avoid democratic collapse. Assume also that the country is unlikely to change either its level of income or its electoral rules in the near future.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Parliamentarism would be the better choice for a poor country with a multiparty system that wants to avoid democratic collapse. This is because parliamentary systems provide more opportunities for building coalitions, which can be crucial in a diverse country with multiple parties. Presidential systems, on the other hand, can lead to polarization and gridlock, especially in countries with weak institutions or low levels of trust in government. Additionally, parliamentary systems provide more flexibility in responding to crises or changing political circumstances since the prime minister can be replaced without having to hold new elections.

If You Were Asked to Recommend Whether a Poor Country