If you were asked to recommend whether a rich country with a two-party system should adopt presidentialism or parliamentarism, which would you choose? Assume that your goal is to allow them to avoid democratic collapse. Assume also that the country is unlikely to change either its level of income or its electoral rules in the near future.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Parliamentarism is more likely to avoid democratic collapse in a rich country with a two-party system because it is more likely to produce stable governments. In a presidential system, the president is elected separately from the legislature, which can lead to gridlock and instability. In a parliamentary system, the prime minister is elected by the legislature, which makes it more likely that the government will be able to pass legislation and function effectively.

If You Were Asked to Recommend Whether a Rich Country