Legislative elections were held in Sweden on September 17, 2006, and seven parties won seats. Although the left-wing Social Democratic Party won more seats than any other party, the leader of the largest right-wing party was appointed to be the first formateur. Which of the following statements might best explain this choice?
A) The choice of formateur is random. As a result, the leader of the largest right-wing party had the same chance of being chosen as did each of the other party leaders.
B) In this particular election, four right-wing parties ran as a preelectoral coalition and together won a majority of the seats. Because they had pledged to govern together if successful, it made sense to give the leader of the largest coalition party the position of formateur.
C) The position of formateur is always offered first to a party on the right; if the first attempt to form a government fails, the second formateur will be chosen from a left-wing party, and so on.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q22: Which of the following is an example
Q23: Based on the following information from the
Q24: Based on the following information from the
Q25: The March 2007 unity or grand coalition
Q26: Legislative elections were held in Finland on
Q28: Look at Table 11.17 at the end
Q29: Look at Table 11.17 at the end
Q30: What happens in a presidential democracy when
Q31: How are cabinet portfolios typically allocated in
Q32: Empirically, cabinet portfolios are distributed among government
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents