Some Scholars Have Maintained That Social Science Should Be Completely

Some scholars have maintained that social science should be completely "value-free." That is, so far as possible, social scientists should eliminate personal values from their research, and they should remain impartial regarding the application of their findings. Their only obligation, in short, is to accurately report what they know, based on their research. Carefully evaluate the tenability of this position. Is it consistent with ethical guidelines regarding the dissemination of knowledge?