In Cobbe v Yoeman's Row (2008) 1 WLR 1752 the court insisted that the rigid requirements to establish a claim in proprietary estoppel must be proven.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The statement is correct as the court in Cobbe v Yoeman's Row (2008) 1 WLR 1752 emphasized that the claimant in proprietary estoppel must prove the requirements of the doctrine such as assurance, reliance, and detriment.

In Cobbe V Yoeman's Row (2008) 1 WLR 1752 the Court