Nagel says, "Since justifications must come to an end somewhere, nothing is gained by denying that they end where they appear to, within life, or by trying to subsume the multiple, often trivial ordinary justifications of action under a single, controlling life scheme."

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Nagel is arguing that there is no point in trying to create a grand, all-encompassing "life scheme" to justify our actions, as this is not how ordinary justifications work in real life. Instead, he suggests that we should accept that our justifications for our actions will always be limited and contextual.

Nagel Says, "Since Justifications Must Come to an End Somewhere