Things are pleasant if, and only if, they are not too crowded. Everything too crowded is noisy. So if something isn't noisy, then something is pleasant.
-Which of the following propositions is a good assumption for conditional proof for the above argument?
A) (∃x)∼Nx
B) ∼(∃x)Nx
C) ∼(∃x)∼Nx
D) ∼Nx
E) Nx

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument essentially states that if something is not noisy, it can be considered pleasant. Option A, which translates to "There exists something that is not noisy," directly supports the conclusion that something can be pleasant, aligning with the argument's logic.

Things Are Pleasant If, and Only If, They Are Not