One may claim that the suffering of animals counts less than the suffering of humans because humans are_______, and animals are not.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The argument suggests that the suffering of animals is considered less important than the suffering of humans because humans possess rationality, which animals lack. This implies that rationality plays a critical role in determining the moral worth of an individual's pain and suffering. However, this argument is often contested, and alternative perspectives argue for the moral importance of non-human sentient beings based on their capacity to feel and suffer, regardless of their rational abilities.

One May Claim That the Suffering of Animals Counts Less