Ross is both an intuitionist and a pluralist. He thinks we can acquire knowledge of the correct moral principles by consulting our deepest intuitions, and he thinks that by so doing we will discover a plurality of principles, not reducible to a single principle, as utilitarians claim. First of all, do you agree with Ross that we can discover the true principles by consulting our intuitions? And second, do you agree that the principles are, in the last analysis, irreducible to one overarching principle? What are the objections to these positions? Suppose you and I consult our intuitions and come to different conclusions. How can we adjudicate the conflict?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q35: According to Frankena, what difficulty exists in
Q36: Why does Frankena suggest that Kant's universalization
Q37: What does Frankena mean by "There is
Q38: Do you agree with Frankena's criticisms of
Q39: What is W. D. Ross's argument against
Q41: What does Ross mean by prima facie
Q42: In "A Horseman in the Sky," what
Q43: How does this story bear upon deontological
Q44: What would a utilitarian have done in
Q45: Evaluate Charles Fried's argument against lying. Why
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents