Here is an illustration. I have given my whole life to support political party X, which had admirable goals and did much good. But the party has been irremediably morally corrupted and now is harming people. Still my sense of integrity is tied up in all the good the party once stood for. I reason that it would be a good thing to destroy the party, for the good of humanity, and I have the opportunity to do so. But my sense of integrity prevents me from easily doing this. I deeply identify with party X. Although this may be a hard decision, many ethicists would argue that we must overcome our squeamishness and do the right thing: destroy party X, so that its present evil will be ineffectual. How would Williams deal with this case? How would you?
Correct Answer:
Answered by Quizplus AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q37: Analyze Kai Nielsen's arguments for utilitarianism. What
Q38: Does it make sense to use utilitarian
Q39: Consider the two examples given in Nielsen's
Q40: What is negative responsibility? What are its
Q41: Why does Williams reject the utilitarian notion
Q42: What is Williams' main objection to consequentialism
Q43: What does Williams mean by integrity? What
Q45: Discuss how Ursula Le Guin's story applies
Q46: Do we already live in a world
Q47: Concerning the case of Seaman Holmes, do
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents