In which of the following cases was the product in question found to be defective?
Please select all that apply.
A) Worsley v Tambrands [2000]
B) Abouzaid v Mothercare [2000]
C) Richardson v LRC Products Ltd [2001]
D) A and others v National Blood Authority [2001]
E) Bogle and others v McDonald's Restaurants Ltd [2002]
F) Pollard v Tesco Stores Ltd [2006]
G) Hufford v Samsung Electronics (UK) Ltd [2014]
H) Gee and others v DePuy International Ltd [2018]
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following best describes the
Q2: It is only possible to recover the
Q3: Which of the following statements form part
Q4: What claims can be made under Part
Q5: When is a product 'defective' under Part
Q7: In Commission of the European Union v
Q8: Match the section of the Consumer Protection
Q9: Match the section of the Consumer Protection
Q10: Match the section of the Consumer Protection
Q11: Match the section of the Consumer Protection
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents