(Table: Matcha Tea and Coho Salmon Production Possibilities II) Use Table: Matcha Tea and Coho Salmon Production Possibilities II. This table shows the maximum amounts of matcha tea and Coho salmon, both measured in pounds, that Colombia and Washington can produce if each produces just one good. Colombia has a comparative advantage in the production of:
?
?
?
$$\begin{array}{l}
\text { Table: Matcha Tea and Coho Salmon }\
\begin{array} { | l | l | l | }
\hline & \text { Matcha Tea } & \text { Coho Salmon } \
\hline \text { Colombia } & 40 & 20 \
\hline \text { Washington } & 10 & 10 \
\hline
\end{array}
\end{array}$$

Question

(Table: Matcha Tea and Coho Salmon Production Possibilities II) Use Table: Matcha Tea and Coho Salmon Production Possibilities II. This table shows the maximum amounts of matcha tea and Coho salmon, both measured in pounds, that Colombia and Washington can produce if each produces just one good. Colombia has a comparative advantage in the production of:
?
?
?
 $$\begin{array}{l}
\text { Table: Matcha Tea and Coho Salmon }\
\begin{array} { | l | l | l | } 
\hline & \text { Matcha Tea } & \text { Coho Salmon } \
\hline \text { Colombia } & 40 & 20 \
\hline \text { Washington } & 10 & 10 \
\hline
\end{array}
\end{array}$$

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Colombia has a comparative advantage in producing matcha tea because it can produce more matcha tea (40 pounds) compared to Washington (10 pounds), indicating a higher efficiency in matcha tea production. Comparative advantage is determined by who can produce a good at a lower opportunity cost, and in this case, Colombia's higher production capability in matcha tea suggests its comparative advantage in that area.