What is the difference between white-listing and name-and-shame campaigns?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is White-listing and name-and-shame campaigns are two distinct approaches used by organizations and individuals to influence behavior, promote certain standards, or enforce rules.

White-listing is a proactive security measure or policy approach where only pre-approved entities (such as software applications, email addresses, users, or organizations) are allowed access to a particular resource, system, or network. The idea is to prevent unauthorized or potentially harmful interactions by only allowing trusted and verified entities. In a broader sense, white-listing can also refer to any practice where only certain approved items or people are included or allowed to participate in an activity or benefit from a service.

For example, in cybersecurity, a white-list might include a list of applications that are allowed to run on a company's network, effectively blocking all others that are not explicitly approved. In a commercial context, a retailer might white-list suppliers who meet specific ethical standards, thereby ensuring that their products are sourced responsibly.

Name-and-shame campaigns, on the other hand, are a form of public advocacy or pressure tactic where individuals or organizations are publicly called out for their bad behavior, unethical practices, or failure to meet certain standards. The goal of these campaigns is to bring attention to the actions of the targeted entities and to encourage them to change their behavior due to public scrutiny and potential reputational damage.

Name-and-shame campaigns are often used by consumer groups, activists, or regulatory bodies to highlight issues such as labor rights violations, environmental damage, or corporate misconduct. By publicly exposing the wrongdoing, these campaigns hope to mobilize public opinion and consumer behavior against the offending parties, thereby forcing them to amend their ways or face social and economic consequences.

In summary, white-listing is about setting a positive standard by only allowing certain approved entities access or privileges, while name-and-shame campaigns are about highlighting negative behavior to pressure entities into changing their actions. White-listing is a preventative and inclusionary approach, whereas name-and-shame is a reactive and often exclusionary tactic.

What Is the Difference Between White-Listing and Name-And-Shame Campaigns