Why do Balaam and Dillman think that the international order established after World War II is threatened? What trends do they point to suggesting that this order is weakening?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The Answer is Balaam and Dillman believe that the international order established after World War II is threatened due to several trends that suggest its weakening. They argue that the rise of populism and nationalism in various countries has led to a decline in support for international institutions and agreements. This has resulted in a decrease in cooperation and an increase in unilateral actions by individual countries, undermining the multilateral approach that has been a cornerstone of the post-World War II international order.

Additionally, they point to the erosion of trust and cooperation among major powers, such as the United States, China, and Russia, as a significant threat to the international order. The increasing tensions and competition among these powers have led to a breakdown in diplomatic relations and a rise in geopolitical conflicts, further weakening the global governance system.

Furthermore, Balaam and Dillman highlight the challenges posed by non-state actors, such as terrorist organizations and transnational criminal networks, which have exploited the weaknesses in the international order to advance their own agendas. This has led to a breakdown in security and stability, further undermining the effectiveness of the established international order.

Overall, Balaam and Dillman argue that these trends collectively pose a significant threat to the international order established after World War II, and unless addressed, they could lead to further destabilization and conflict on a global scale.

Why Do Balaam and Dillman Think That the International Order