In terms of implementation, what differentiates US social programs from a universal basic income (UBI) approach?
A) UBI is more holistic and simpler to implement. Unlike specific programs in the U.S. for different needs such as health care, nutrition, or housing), the notion of a basic income for everyone resolves many of those issues in one step.
B) UBI programs are socialist and the U.S. has a democracy.
C) Nothing is privatized in a universal basic income context, whereas even social programs in the U.S. can have for-profit components.
D) US social programs are more streamlined, less complex, and efficient than a UBI system would be.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

UBI is different from US social programs because it provides a single, holistic solution to multiple issues, while US social programs are specific and targeted to address individual needs, such as healthcare or housing. UBI is simpler to implement because it doesn't require a complex bureaucracy to determine eligibility and distribute benefits, and it provides a basic income for everyone regardless of their circumstances. This is in contrast to the US social programs, which can be complicated, require extensive administration, and can have eligibility requirements that vary based on income, location, and other factors.

In Terms of Implementation, What Differentiates US Social Programs from a Universal