What Does It Mean, Following Jones V Kernott [2012] 1

What does it mean, following Jones v Kernott [2012] 1 AC 776, that the courts can now impute an intention a common intention to share the family home?

A) The court consider all the evidence, and construct a common intention from evidence of the oral conversations and conduct of the parties.
B) The court decides what the parties would have intended, if they had thought about it and awards a share of the home which is fair in all the circumstances.
C) The court presumes that the beneficial interest will be held in equal shares, unless a contrary intention is demonstrated by the parties.
D) The court looks to what the parties have orally agreed between themselves expressly and gives effect to that.