Which of the following has not been considered good evidence to rebut the presumption of advancement? (You need to be aware of the case law in this area before answering)
A) The receipt of rents or profits on a lease purchased by a father in the name of his son.
B) Where a husband guaranteed an overdraft on a bank account on his wife's account to solve an immediate banking emergency.
C) Where shares are transferred by a father to his son to qualify a son to become a director of a company.
D) Where a husband, through reasons of ill health, opened a joint bank account with his wife, so that she may draw cheques on the account for him.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Which of the following statements most accurately
Q2: Which of the following statements explains why
Q3: Which of the following most accurately explains
Q4: Which of the following statements is false
Q5: Which of the following statements is true
Q6: Which of the following statements is true
Q8: Which of the following statements is false
Q9: Which of the following is not considered
Q10: Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents