Consider the deductive argument below: God is love. Love is blind. Stevie Wonder is blind. Therefore, Stevie Wonder is God. This syllogism is:
A) True
B) Valid
C) Invalid (More than four terms, more than two premises)
D) Sound

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The syllogism is invalid because it has more than two premises and four terms. It also commits the fallacy of equivocation by using "blind" in two different senses. Therefore, the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises.

Consider the Deductive Argument Below: God Is Love