How did the decisions of Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger answer the question of whether promoting diversity was grounds enough to support the constitutionality of affirmative action?
A) It was in the government's best interest to promote educational diversity, and race could be heavily weighted in making an admission decision.
B) It was in the government's best interest to equally balance educational diversity with all other factors in making an admission decision.
C) It was in the government's best interest to promote educational diversity, as long as admission decisions were not heavily influenced by race considerations.
D) It was in the government's best interest to make race a predominant factor in making an admission decision.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Since the Gratz and Grutter decisions, affirmative
Q3: Which of the following is an example
Q4: What are the two ways equality can
Q5: Civil liberties are
A) the legal and moral
Q6: Which of the following events is not
Q8: What word, most significant to the understanding
Q9: Quotas are
A) a legal part of affirmative
Q10: The test of strict scrutiny shifted the
Q11: The Supreme Court has actively pursued equality,
Q12: Civil rights are
A) fundamental individual rights that
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents