In this case, the Supreme Court further defined the nature of interrogation of a suspect, differentiating conversation amongst police officers from the express interrogation of a suspect.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Rhode Island v. Innis, the Supreme Court ruled that interrogation refers to direct questioning as well as any words or actions that the police should know are likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect. The Court also defined conversation among police officers as distinct from interrogation. Mallory v. United States dealt with the requirement for prompt presentment before a magistrate, Stack v. Boyle dealt with bail in federal cases, and Weeks v. United States dealt with the exclusionary rule.

In This Case, the Supreme Court Further Defined the Nature