Hill claims that it's possible to not regard an act as wrong while at the same time seeing it as reflecting something objectionable about the person who performed that act.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Hill argues that we can hold a person morally responsible for their actions without necessarily judging those actions as wrong. In other words, we can say that the person ought to have acted differently, but at the same time not view their actions as immoral or blameworthy. This means that we can see an act as reflecting something negative about the person's character or values, without necessarily condemning them for it.

Hill Claims That It's Possible to Not Regard an Act