According to Norcross, there is no morally relevant difference between the clearly wrongful behavior of Fred and those who knowingly eat meat produced through factory farming.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In his article "Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases," Norcross argues that there is no morally relevant difference between the wrongful behavior of Fred (who locks his puppy in a closet and kicks him for fun) and those who knowingly contribute to the suffering of animals in factory farming through their meat consumption.

According to Norcross, There Is No Morally Relevant Difference Between