Thomson discusses a different version of the violinist case wherein the violinist only needs to use your kidneys for one hour to survive. Her own view about this case is that

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Thomson argues that just because you have an obligation to let the violinist use your kidneys for one hour, it does not necessarily mean that the violinist has a right to use your kidneys. She argues that you may have a moral obligation to help someone even if they do not have a right to that help. Therefore, even though you should let the violinist use your kidneys for one hour, it does not mean the violinist has a right to use your kidneys.

Thomson Discusses a Different Version of the Violinist Case Wherein