Which of the following best characterizes Rachels's argument?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Rachels argues that there is no inherent moral difference between killing and letting die, and therefore there is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia. He argues that the moral distinction made between the two is based on a mistaken belief that the latter is less bad because it involves "allowing nature to take its course". He argues that this distinction is irrelevant, and that what matters is the intention of the action and the outcome it produces. Therefore, he concludes that both active and passive euthanasia are morally permissible, provided they are done with the intention of relieving suffering and respecting the autonomy and dignity of the patient.

Which of the Following Best Characterizes Rachels's Argument