According to Callahan, there is no inherent moral difference between killing a patient directly by euthanasia and allowing a patient to die by deliberating terminating a patient's life-supporting treatment.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Callahan argues that there is a moral difference between killing a patient directly through euthanasia and allowing a patient to die through the termination of life-supporting treatment. He believes that intentionally causing death is morally wrong, while withdrawing or withholding treatment can be morally justifiable under certain circumstances, such as when the treatment is futile or when it causes undue suffering. Therefore, he does not see them as morally equivalent actions.

According to Callahan, There Is No Inherent Moral Difference Between