Which of a, b and c below is correct? In Case C- 413/99 Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the ECJ held that:
A) Article 21(1) TFEU is directly effective.
B) Some implementing measures are still necessary and therefore in their absence Article 21(1) TFEU is not directly effective.
C) That Article 21(1) TFEU can never be directly effective because its wording lacks the necessary clarity and further because it does not grant rights to individuals.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

In Case C-413/99 Baumbast and R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the ECJ held that Article 21(1) TFEU is directly effective, meaning it can be relied upon by individuals in national courts without the need for implementing measures. The court rejected the argument that implementing measures were necessary for the provision to be effective. Moreover, the court emphasized that Article 21(1) TFEU grants rights to individuals, including the right to move and reside freely within the EU. Therefore, option A is correct, while options B and C are incorrect.

Which of A, B and C Below Is Correct? in Case